1 00:00:01,020 --> 00:00:03,390 The following content is provided under a Creative 2 00:00:03,390 --> 00:00:04,780 Commons license. 3 00:00:04,780 --> 00:00:06,990 Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare 4 00:00:06,990 --> 00:00:11,080 continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. 5 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:13,650 To make a donation or to view additional materials 6 00:00:13,650 --> 00:00:17,580 from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare 7 00:00:17,580 --> 00:00:18,486 at ocw.mit.edu. 8 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:25,350 GARY GENSLER: So let's turn to this world 9 00:00:25,350 --> 00:00:27,310 of initial coin offerings. 10 00:00:27,310 --> 00:00:30,420 And so we're going to chat about it today and next Tuesday. 11 00:00:30,420 --> 00:00:34,080 Next Tuesday, we'll come back to the regulatory side of this. 12 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,382 And in fact, there were some new things out 13 00:00:37,382 --> 00:00:39,090 of the Securities and Exchange Commission 14 00:00:39,090 --> 00:00:42,480 even last week on initial coin offerings. 15 00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:47,970 But we're going to spend a little time on ICOs today. 16 00:00:47,970 --> 00:00:53,010 And so of course, we've talked about Bakkt already. 17 00:00:53,010 --> 00:00:55,360 And we'll talk about their characteristics. 18 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:57,090 What is an initial coin offering? 19 00:00:57,090 --> 00:01:00,160 What is this new form of crowdfunding? 20 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,980 How to evaluate initial coin offerings-- and some of this 21 00:01:02,980 --> 00:01:04,870 will be familiar, because it's how 22 00:01:04,870 --> 00:01:07,990 to really evaluate any blockchain technology 23 00:01:07,990 --> 00:01:10,390 project in some regard. 24 00:01:10,390 --> 00:01:12,670 And then I'm going to share some statistics, 25 00:01:12,670 --> 00:01:16,270 and then hopefully wish you all a Happy Thanksgiving 26 00:01:16,270 --> 00:01:17,200 and call it a day. 27 00:01:20,980 --> 00:01:24,940 So the study question was, what is 28 00:01:24,940 --> 00:01:26,460 this new form of crowdfunding? 29 00:01:26,460 --> 00:01:28,240 Does anybody want to tell me? 30 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:31,390 What is an ICO in the easiest way? 31 00:01:31,390 --> 00:01:34,183 You're going home for Thanksgiving and somebody says, 32 00:01:34,183 --> 00:01:35,350 what have you been studying? 33 00:01:35,350 --> 00:01:36,640 And you say ICOs. 34 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:39,190 What is an ICO? 35 00:01:39,190 --> 00:01:40,687 Yeah? 36 00:01:40,687 --> 00:01:42,770 AUDIENCE: It's a startup that sells its own crypto 37 00:01:42,770 --> 00:01:45,070 token to raise money. 38 00:01:45,070 --> 00:01:46,605 GARY GENSLER: So it's a-- 39 00:01:46,605 --> 00:01:51,460 AUDIENCE: Sells its own crypto token to raise money. 40 00:01:51,460 --> 00:01:54,280 GARY GENSLER: So it's a way to raise money with a crypto 41 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:56,623 token, pretty simple. 42 00:01:56,623 --> 00:01:58,040 AUDIENCE: And in addition to that, 43 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:00,640 it gives people an expectation that the token's value 44 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:03,288 will go up in the future. 45 00:02:03,288 --> 00:02:05,830 GARY GENSLER: Did anybody read the optional reading for today 46 00:02:05,830 --> 00:02:09,835 about the dude that actually came up with this idea? 47 00:02:09,835 --> 00:02:11,315 Do you remember his name? 48 00:02:11,315 --> 00:02:11,815 | 49 00:02:11,815 --> 00:02:12,940 AUDIENCE: JR. 50 00:02:12,940 --> 00:02:14,365 GARY GENSLER: JR, Willett, is it? 51 00:02:14,365 --> 00:02:14,990 AUDIENCE: Yeah. 52 00:02:14,990 --> 00:02:16,570 GARY GENSLER: Yeah. 53 00:02:16,570 --> 00:02:19,690 I mean, I don't know if anybody watched the video, 54 00:02:19,690 --> 00:02:22,780 but this individual in 2010 came up 55 00:02:22,780 --> 00:02:25,930 with an idea of saying Bitcoin is out there. 56 00:02:25,930 --> 00:02:28,420 I mean, Bitcoin was selling for like $0.06, 57 00:02:28,420 --> 00:02:30,970 $0.10 a Bitcoin or something. 58 00:02:30,970 --> 00:02:35,620 He said, if you could put something on top of Bitcoin-- 59 00:02:35,620 --> 00:02:37,960 I don't even know if you use the term smart contract. 60 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:40,090 But he did say, if you could put an application 61 00:02:40,090 --> 00:02:42,670 on top of Bitcoin-- it was before Vitalik Buterin 62 00:02:42,670 --> 00:02:44,800 came along with Ethereum. 63 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,930 He said, you could raise a lot of money. 64 00:02:47,930 --> 00:02:49,930 And he went to conference after conference 65 00:02:49,930 --> 00:02:52,300 and tried to convince people. 66 00:02:52,300 --> 00:02:54,550 And there's even this one feedback 67 00:02:54,550 --> 00:02:58,040 where somebody said to him in an email exchange, 68 00:02:58,040 --> 00:02:59,680 you're probably breaking the law. 69 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:01,480 This can't be legal. 70 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:03,790 But he couldn't get anybody to adopt this idea. 71 00:03:06,670 --> 00:03:10,390 And he's not wealthy now either. 72 00:03:10,390 --> 00:03:13,690 He missed the whole ICO way, but he was basically 73 00:03:13,690 --> 00:03:16,450 the inventor of this initial coin offering, 74 00:03:16,450 --> 00:03:18,610 saying that the technology of Bitcoin, 75 00:03:18,610 --> 00:03:20,740 even the scripting language, was enough 76 00:03:20,740 --> 00:03:23,800 that you could maybe raise money on top of Bitcoin 77 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:25,180 with an application layer. 78 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:34,650 And we'll sort through. 79 00:03:34,650 --> 00:03:39,650 Now, I'm going to see if I can do a little video for you. 80 00:03:39,650 --> 00:03:42,920 This shouldn't be too hard for me. 81 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:48,560 So this is a two minute video of all the ICOs 82 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:50,420 that have ever happened. 83 00:03:50,420 --> 00:03:53,000 And Elementus, I've shown you this picture, 84 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,040 but you know there wasn't much. 85 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:55,850 Where we are we? 86 00:03:55,850 --> 00:03:57,560 Are we in 2015 now? 87 00:03:57,560 --> 00:03:58,940 Nothing. 88 00:03:58,940 --> 00:04:00,650 So you see the first ICO that they 89 00:04:00,650 --> 00:04:06,068 mark in there is Ethereum itself raised $18 million. 90 00:04:06,068 --> 00:04:06,860 I apologize. 91 00:04:06,860 --> 00:04:08,360 It's only going to take two minutes, 92 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:12,480 but you're going to see the whole history of ICOs. 93 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:14,330 And then there's nothing. 94 00:04:14,330 --> 00:04:16,970 It's really-- so you can see no country, 95 00:04:16,970 --> 00:04:22,110 no official sector is really focused on this in 2016. 96 00:04:22,110 --> 00:04:24,510 But then there's going to be a big offering 97 00:04:24,510 --> 00:04:26,550 in the middle of 2016. 98 00:04:26,550 --> 00:04:28,910 Anybody know who that is? 99 00:04:28,910 --> 00:04:30,320 Dow. 100 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:34,940 $168 million, and it fails. 101 00:04:34,940 --> 00:04:39,570 It spectacularly fails. $50 million of it is stolen 102 00:04:39,570 --> 00:04:43,730 and it leads to the Ethereum fork and things like that. 103 00:04:43,730 --> 00:04:48,750 But still not a lot, and then, by the summer of '17, 104 00:04:48,750 --> 00:04:51,350 Katy bar the door. 105 00:04:51,350 --> 00:04:55,730 Tasos and quarter billion dollars, Filecoin, 106 00:04:55,730 --> 00:04:58,100 a quarter billion dollars. 107 00:04:58,100 --> 00:05:04,340 And then oh, I pulled the one that finished in 2017. 108 00:05:04,340 --> 00:05:06,730 I'm sorry. 109 00:05:06,730 --> 00:05:10,150 So there's the final chart that goes all the way 110 00:05:10,150 --> 00:05:10,930 through August. 111 00:05:10,930 --> 00:05:13,150 Now, some say that it's not $28 billion. 112 00:05:13,150 --> 00:05:15,670 Some say it's $23 billion, because there's 113 00:05:15,670 --> 00:05:18,390 no really good figures. 114 00:05:18,390 --> 00:05:24,010 But EOS raises $4.2 billion and Telegram raises $1.7 billion, 115 00:05:24,010 --> 00:05:26,560 huge amounts of money. 116 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:27,730 And this is in a period-- 117 00:05:27,730 --> 00:05:30,820 almost all of this was raised and in about 12 months, 118 00:05:30,820 --> 00:05:34,300 from June of '17 to June of '18. 119 00:05:34,300 --> 00:05:38,430 Call it $25 billion in that 12 months. 120 00:05:38,430 --> 00:05:39,800 And now, it's trickling off. 121 00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:43,100 Now, it's less than $0.5 billion month. 122 00:05:43,100 --> 00:05:46,970 But that $25 billion in 12 months 123 00:05:46,970 --> 00:05:48,640 compares to venture capital-- 124 00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:49,890 and Simone, you might help me. 125 00:05:49,890 --> 00:05:53,450 But venture capital worldwide is about $150 billion 126 00:05:53,450 --> 00:05:56,930 a year in a 12 month period. 127 00:05:56,930 --> 00:06:01,480 I think the figures range from $125 to $170 billion. 128 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:03,950 So just to give you a sense, in this 12 month 129 00:06:03,950 --> 00:06:09,200 period, it's, give or take, 20% of the size of all venture 130 00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:14,400 funds, 20% to 30% roughly of all venture funds. 131 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:19,250 And again, it's tailing off, but it's significant. 132 00:06:19,250 --> 00:06:23,090 If you can come up with an idea in these 12 months 133 00:06:23,090 --> 00:06:28,460 and raise the money, JR Willett's idea, 134 00:06:28,460 --> 00:06:32,600 this was the moment. 135 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:34,430 So what are initial coin offerings? 136 00:06:34,430 --> 00:06:37,700 What's the more detailed characteristics? 137 00:06:37,700 --> 00:06:39,980 Well, number one, they're proceeds 138 00:06:39,980 --> 00:06:41,180 that help build a network. 139 00:06:41,180 --> 00:06:44,060 That's what Vitalik Buterin actually did back 140 00:06:44,060 --> 00:06:51,330 in 2013 is when he published, in 2014 is when he went live. 141 00:06:51,330 --> 00:06:57,540 But he was raising $18 million, hired a law firm, big, big law 142 00:06:57,540 --> 00:06:58,580 firm in-- 143 00:06:58,580 --> 00:07:01,020 I can't remember if it was Perkins or Skadden Arps, 144 00:07:01,020 --> 00:07:04,990 but a big US law firm, partnered up with a Canadian, Joe 145 00:07:04,990 --> 00:07:09,270 Lubin, who saw this potential in a 19 146 00:07:09,270 --> 00:07:13,983 or 20-year-old kid who had great writing skills. 147 00:07:13,983 --> 00:07:15,150 He knew a lot about Bitcoin. 148 00:07:15,150 --> 00:07:17,275 He had been writing about it for a number of years, 149 00:07:17,275 --> 00:07:20,238 but he also had a great idea. 150 00:07:20,238 --> 00:07:23,800 He moved off to Switzerland for regulatory and other reasons 151 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:28,150 set up a foundation for tax and other reasons, 152 00:07:28,150 --> 00:07:30,080 and did it in a very professional way. 153 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:31,900 But you can look at their sources and uses. 154 00:07:31,900 --> 00:07:33,880 You can go back to the original offering 155 00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:36,340 and say they were willing to say what they were going 156 00:07:36,340 --> 00:07:38,650 to use the $18 million for-- 157 00:07:38,650 --> 00:07:43,030 law fees and counting fees and the usual things you 158 00:07:43,030 --> 00:07:45,370 do when you start something. 159 00:07:45,370 --> 00:07:48,190 So it's proceeds to help build up a network. 160 00:07:48,190 --> 00:07:51,220 But just like that moment, it was before the network 161 00:07:51,220 --> 00:07:51,845 could be used. 162 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:58,390 So that was pre-functional. 163 00:07:58,390 --> 00:07:59,950 We're going to show statistics later, 164 00:07:59,950 --> 00:08:02,620 but anybody want to take a gander in the last three 165 00:08:02,620 --> 00:08:03,740 months. 166 00:08:03,740 --> 00:08:05,320 So this isn't back 2014. 167 00:08:05,320 --> 00:08:07,660 I'm talking about third quarter of 2018. 168 00:08:07,660 --> 00:08:09,490 What percentage of token offerings 169 00:08:09,490 --> 00:08:13,600 were offered before the network is functional, fully 170 00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,930 functional? 171 00:08:16,930 --> 00:08:18,090 Alin? 172 00:08:18,090 --> 00:08:20,060 AUDIENCE: 99%. 173 00:08:20,060 --> 00:08:22,820 GARY GENSLER: Anybody else want to take a-- 174 00:08:22,820 --> 00:08:23,990 argue with Alin? 175 00:08:23,990 --> 00:08:25,940 Just because he is a computer scientist? 176 00:08:25,940 --> 00:08:26,785 Tom? 177 00:08:26,785 --> 00:08:28,182 AUDIENCE: I was going to say 95%. 178 00:08:28,182 --> 00:08:29,390 GARY GENSLER: All right, 95%. 179 00:08:29,390 --> 00:08:31,430 All right, so we've got a market. 180 00:08:31,430 --> 00:08:33,320 So 95%, 99%. 181 00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:40,140 Does anybody want to say that more than 5% were functional? 182 00:08:40,140 --> 00:08:40,640 No? 183 00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:44,500 All right, I'll give you the number later. 184 00:08:44,500 --> 00:08:46,920 It's in between the two of you. 185 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:49,690 It's in between the two of you. 186 00:08:49,690 --> 00:08:54,370 So it's raising money before something is functional. 187 00:08:54,370 --> 00:08:58,180 It's like raising the money for a Broadway play 188 00:08:58,180 --> 00:09:00,685 before you've got the actors and the script. 189 00:09:03,980 --> 00:09:07,160 Or it's even worse than that. 190 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:08,600 You don't even have the idea. 191 00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:10,580 But usually, you have an idea. 192 00:09:10,580 --> 00:09:13,550 Usually-- what percentage of ICOs 193 00:09:13,550 --> 00:09:16,890 are marketed on just an idea? 194 00:09:16,890 --> 00:09:17,510 Anybody? 195 00:09:17,510 --> 00:09:20,720 I have that statistic later, too. 196 00:09:20,720 --> 00:09:23,080 Rahim, you have a view? 197 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:24,205 What do you think? 198 00:09:24,205 --> 00:09:26,296 AUDIENCE: I would think maybe of these 199 00:09:26,296 --> 00:09:28,480 with an idea, maybe 60% to 70%. 200 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:29,980 GARY GENSLER: 60% to 70%. 201 00:09:29,980 --> 00:09:30,550 Sean? 202 00:09:30,550 --> 00:09:32,040 AUDIENCE: I would say 90%. 203 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:32,830 GARY GENSLER: 90%. 204 00:09:32,830 --> 00:09:36,290 All right, no, it's in between the two of you. 205 00:09:36,290 --> 00:09:37,490 Rahim is a little closer. 206 00:09:37,490 --> 00:09:42,860 It's about 75%, just an idea, or at least as defined 207 00:09:42,860 --> 00:09:47,060 by a certain tracking center. 208 00:09:47,060 --> 00:09:49,910 So it's usually you have an idea, you market it, 209 00:09:49,910 --> 00:09:51,500 you raise some money, or at least 210 00:09:51,500 --> 00:09:55,880 during these boom periods in the last 15 months. 211 00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:59,750 The development, while open source, is largely centralized. 212 00:09:59,750 --> 00:10:03,210 But in fact, in the last quarter, 213 00:10:03,210 --> 00:10:05,420 the last three months, well over half 214 00:10:05,420 --> 00:10:08,550 isn't even open source technology any longer, 215 00:10:08,550 --> 00:10:12,380 partly because it's so based on just an idea 216 00:10:12,380 --> 00:10:16,940 that people aren't publishing their source code until later. 217 00:10:16,940 --> 00:10:19,550 They will eventually publish some source code. 218 00:10:19,550 --> 00:10:22,670 But at the moment of the initial coin offering, 219 00:10:22,670 --> 00:10:27,810 a majority don't even have open source software at that moment, 220 00:10:27,810 --> 00:10:32,310 even though they say later they'll publish this software. 221 00:10:32,310 --> 00:10:35,000 But even if it's open source, it's highly centralized. 222 00:10:38,540 --> 00:10:39,190 Please. 223 00:10:39,190 --> 00:10:42,160 AUDIENCE: I don't understand how open source is related 224 00:10:42,160 --> 00:10:50,450 to [INAUDIBLE] if I say I'm going to sell something, 225 00:10:50,450 --> 00:10:54,530 these are the coins you should use to pay me back. 226 00:10:54,530 --> 00:10:57,772 Where is open source connected? 227 00:10:57,772 --> 00:10:59,230 GARY GENSLER: So there's a movement 228 00:10:59,230 --> 00:11:03,250 in technology and software development-- 229 00:11:03,250 --> 00:11:06,130 certainly, it was started in the 1990s, 230 00:11:06,130 --> 00:11:07,810 but it may have been earlier. 231 00:11:07,810 --> 00:11:09,820 But now, it's very prevalent-- where 232 00:11:09,820 --> 00:11:12,220 you publish your software and everybody can see it. 233 00:11:12,220 --> 00:11:15,070 So it's transparency in software. 234 00:11:15,070 --> 00:11:17,160 That's called the open source movement. 235 00:11:17,160 --> 00:11:22,510 In the blockchain technology, when Satoshi Nakamoto first 236 00:11:22,510 --> 00:11:27,130 published the Bitcoin software in January of 2009, 237 00:11:27,130 --> 00:11:28,320 it was open source. 238 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:31,210 It meant everybody could see the computer code. 239 00:11:31,210 --> 00:11:33,190 And you could even-- 240 00:11:33,190 --> 00:11:35,140 it's actually published under an MIT 241 00:11:35,140 --> 00:11:38,680 license, which meant you didn't have to pay any fee to use it. 242 00:11:38,680 --> 00:11:42,940 Zero fee, you can copy it, you can use the Bitcoin core 243 00:11:42,940 --> 00:11:43,780 software. 244 00:11:43,780 --> 00:11:45,880 That's the definition. 245 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:48,160 That's the best definition of open source, 246 00:11:48,160 --> 00:11:50,530 because it's with an MIT license. 247 00:11:50,530 --> 00:11:53,320 But it's truly open. 248 00:11:53,320 --> 00:11:55,480 That's what I'm referencing here. 249 00:11:55,480 --> 00:11:58,690 And the relevance is that, though there 250 00:11:58,690 --> 00:12:01,590 is a big open source movement in a lot of fields 251 00:12:01,590 --> 00:12:04,750 and in blockchain and certainly in Bitcoin 252 00:12:04,750 --> 00:12:07,630 and the Ethereum network is open source, 253 00:12:07,630 --> 00:12:13,330 many, many developments and initial coin offerings 254 00:12:13,330 --> 00:12:16,090 don't publish their code until months later. 255 00:12:16,090 --> 00:12:19,850 They raise the money, they're still developing their code. 256 00:12:19,850 --> 00:12:23,500 Are you with me? 257 00:12:23,500 --> 00:12:25,854 So Brotish? 258 00:12:25,854 --> 00:12:27,854 AUDIENCE: So why do investors put in their money 259 00:12:27,854 --> 00:12:29,271 even before the code is published? 260 00:12:35,035 --> 00:12:36,490 GARY GENSLER: So why do investors 261 00:12:36,490 --> 00:12:40,770 put their money in before the code is published? 262 00:12:40,770 --> 00:12:47,300 Why do investors put money into any investment? 263 00:12:47,300 --> 00:12:48,190 Sabrina? 264 00:12:48,190 --> 00:12:48,827 AUDIENCE: FOMO. 265 00:12:48,827 --> 00:12:49,910 GARY GENSLER: What's that? 266 00:12:49,910 --> 00:12:52,430 AUDIENCE: FOMO. 267 00:12:52,430 --> 00:12:54,710 GARY GENSLER: What's FOMO? 268 00:12:54,710 --> 00:12:56,622 Fear of missing out. 269 00:12:56,622 --> 00:12:57,680 All right. 270 00:12:57,680 --> 00:12:59,477 Oh by the way, Sabrina and Thalita, 271 00:12:59,477 --> 00:13:01,310 I announced that anybody that was here today 272 00:13:01,310 --> 00:13:03,860 got double credit for participating right 273 00:13:03,860 --> 00:13:05,470 before Thanksgiving. 274 00:13:05,470 --> 00:13:07,120 So I just want to let you know. 275 00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:10,190 I live by that. 276 00:13:10,190 --> 00:13:11,450 So fear of missing out. 277 00:13:11,450 --> 00:13:14,120 Why else do people invest in any investment, 278 00:13:14,120 --> 00:13:17,608 even if you're just investing in Apple stock? 279 00:13:17,608 --> 00:13:18,650 AUDIENCE: To get returns. 280 00:13:18,650 --> 00:13:21,690 GARY GENSLER: To get returns, to get a profit, 281 00:13:21,690 --> 00:13:25,400 to take risk and a return. 282 00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:26,330 Brotish? 283 00:13:26,330 --> 00:13:27,997 AUDIENCE: I think in one of the readings 284 00:13:27,997 --> 00:13:32,090 they mentioned that one strategy of putting money in an ICO 285 00:13:32,090 --> 00:13:35,190 is going to the board and understanding. 286 00:13:35,190 --> 00:13:37,070 So I thought that that was a prerequisite 287 00:13:37,070 --> 00:13:38,300 for the investment. 288 00:13:38,300 --> 00:13:41,840 I also happened to attend one seminar here 289 00:13:41,840 --> 00:13:44,730 where there was a company called BlockTEST, 290 00:13:44,730 --> 00:13:45,748 which is funded by a-- 291 00:13:45,748 --> 00:13:47,040 GARY GENSLER: What's it called? 292 00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:48,200 Block-- 293 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:49,040 AUDIENCE: BlockTEST. 294 00:13:53,530 --> 00:13:54,780 It's MIT alumni. 295 00:13:54,780 --> 00:13:58,450 So they evaluate these codes and run some solutions 296 00:13:58,450 --> 00:14:00,590 to verify whether they're doing what 297 00:14:00,590 --> 00:14:01,960 they're supposed to be doing. 298 00:14:01,960 --> 00:14:04,130 So I thought that it was a prerequisite 299 00:14:04,130 --> 00:14:05,487 for the investment. 300 00:14:05,487 --> 00:14:07,070 So that's where my question came from. 301 00:14:07,070 --> 00:14:09,695 GARY GENSLER: So you assume that you could always read the code 302 00:14:09,695 --> 00:14:11,740 to make the investment. 303 00:14:11,740 --> 00:14:16,210 In the fall of 2017 and into the spring of 2018, 304 00:14:16,210 --> 00:14:18,740 I would suggest that wasn't always the case. 305 00:14:18,740 --> 00:14:21,710 And in fact, it usually was not the case. 306 00:14:21,710 --> 00:14:23,590 I think if these things are to persist, 307 00:14:23,590 --> 00:14:30,010 my prediction is you'll see more and more rigor 308 00:14:30,010 --> 00:14:32,800 in this marketplace. 309 00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:34,600 Oh, I skipped promoters. 310 00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:37,940 The people starting it keep some of the coins for themselves. 311 00:14:37,940 --> 00:14:41,710 This is not that different from any venture capital round. 312 00:14:41,710 --> 00:14:43,570 When you're raising money and you're 313 00:14:43,570 --> 00:14:47,800 selling equity or selling a preferred stock in something-- 314 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:50,680 you'll know this, any of your taking ventures 315 00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:52,390 course or if you worked in it-- 316 00:14:52,390 --> 00:14:54,560 you're going to keep equity for yourself as well. 317 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,310 So this is just how much do you keep for yourself, 318 00:14:57,310 --> 00:15:01,300 how much do you sell to the public, 319 00:15:01,300 --> 00:15:04,600 but just translated to a new form of capital raising. 320 00:15:04,600 --> 00:15:07,270 Instead of it being applied to your equity, 321 00:15:07,270 --> 00:15:12,870 you're applying it to this new form of fund raising. 322 00:15:12,870 --> 00:15:14,710 They're fungible and transferable, 323 00:15:14,710 --> 00:15:17,740 meaning you can sell them. 324 00:15:17,740 --> 00:15:21,010 Sometimes, you can't sell them for a number of months. 325 00:15:21,010 --> 00:15:22,720 Technically speaking, sometimes you 326 00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:26,620 can't sell him until the platform is functioning. 327 00:15:26,620 --> 00:15:29,470 But often, you can still sell them 328 00:15:29,470 --> 00:15:33,720 by private agreement, private arrangements. 329 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:37,510 Ethereum-- let me just mention something about Ethereum. 330 00:15:37,510 --> 00:15:43,610 When Ethereum was first sold, for 12 months, the only record 331 00:15:43,610 --> 00:15:45,820 you had that you were purchasing Ethereum was 332 00:15:45,820 --> 00:15:50,110 the email return back from either Vitalik or others who 333 00:15:50,110 --> 00:15:52,930 said, yes, you've purchased it. 334 00:15:52,930 --> 00:15:55,900 It wasn't even that you had a private key for 12 months. 335 00:15:55,900 --> 00:15:58,480 You had an email confirmation. 336 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:01,060 But you could, based on that email confirmation, 337 00:16:01,060 --> 00:16:06,430 sell the right to what later you would be issued, a coin. 338 00:16:06,430 --> 00:16:07,170 Sorry? 339 00:16:07,170 --> 00:16:09,130 AUDIENCE: Yeah, so along those lines, 340 00:16:09,130 --> 00:16:12,460 I've seen a number of ICOs use SAFTs, simple agreement 341 00:16:12,460 --> 00:16:14,440 for future tokens. 342 00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:16,720 And I guess I'm wondering what the trade-offs are 343 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:21,490 versus directly issuing the tokens at time of the ICO. 344 00:16:21,490 --> 00:16:24,213 And then more specifically, that just feels like you're not even 345 00:16:24,213 --> 00:16:25,630 getting the token, you're not even 346 00:16:25,630 --> 00:16:29,890 getting the rights to the token until the network launches. 347 00:16:29,890 --> 00:16:33,280 That seems like a second order, really far removal 348 00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:38,230 from even close to any form of a utility on a network. 349 00:16:38,230 --> 00:16:40,100 GARY GENSLER: Is this an answer to the SAFT? 350 00:16:40,100 --> 00:16:41,160 AUDIENCE: Yes. 351 00:16:41,160 --> 00:16:44,510 So isn't it because under the US-- 352 00:16:44,510 --> 00:16:46,930 I mean, right now, the coins aren't 353 00:16:46,930 --> 00:16:48,890 considered as a security. 354 00:16:48,890 --> 00:16:51,610 And if you are doing ICOs, then you 355 00:16:51,610 --> 00:16:55,900 can only sell it to accredited investors [INAUDIBLE] 356 00:16:55,900 --> 00:16:57,490 if you are based in the US, and you 357 00:16:57,490 --> 00:17:01,210 can do some things other than that outside the US. 358 00:17:01,210 --> 00:17:07,569 And so I think SAP is trying to see if coins can-- 359 00:17:07,569 --> 00:17:11,079 at some point, they can be considered as not 360 00:17:11,079 --> 00:17:12,829 as securities. 361 00:17:12,829 --> 00:17:18,160 So I think the purpose of SAP is to, I guess, 362 00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:20,530 expand the basically investor base so 363 00:17:20,530 --> 00:17:22,750 that more people can purchase. 364 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:28,620 GARY GENSLER: So it's Jihee right? 365 00:17:28,620 --> 00:17:32,270 So Jihee's answer delved into the regulatory, 366 00:17:32,270 --> 00:17:35,410 but I'm going to take it up a level from the regulatory. 367 00:17:35,410 --> 00:17:38,360 What you said was accurate, but there's a-- 368 00:17:38,360 --> 00:17:40,730 it's selling something for future delivery, 369 00:17:40,730 --> 00:17:45,420 because the token currently is not usable. 370 00:17:45,420 --> 00:17:48,140 Just in the last quarter, I'm talking about the last quarter 371 00:17:48,140 --> 00:17:51,690 of 2018, three quarters of the ICOs 372 00:17:51,690 --> 00:17:57,680 that were started or launched were just on an idea. 373 00:17:57,680 --> 00:18:01,130 So they hadn't yet written the code. 374 00:18:01,130 --> 00:18:02,910 A token wouldn't even be usable. 375 00:18:02,910 --> 00:18:06,450 So you have some economic basis to say, 376 00:18:06,450 --> 00:18:10,500 I'm trying to sell you something that will be a future delivery. 377 00:18:10,500 --> 00:18:15,510 When Vitalik Buterin even did Ethereum, you got an email. 378 00:18:15,510 --> 00:18:19,530 It was not called a simple agreement for future token. 379 00:18:19,530 --> 00:18:22,830 Is that what SAFT is? 380 00:18:22,830 --> 00:18:25,980 But it was a simple email for a future token. 381 00:18:25,980 --> 00:18:29,730 I mean, it was, in essence, an economic arrangement 382 00:18:29,730 --> 00:18:33,420 where you exchanged Bitcoin for an email. 383 00:18:33,420 --> 00:18:36,240 And that email, some 12 months later, 384 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:40,390 you would get a private key when the genesis block happened. 385 00:18:40,390 --> 00:18:42,270 And most of these still had to deal 386 00:18:42,270 --> 00:18:44,880 with that economic arrangement. 387 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:48,330 Then a law firm here in Boston took 388 00:18:48,330 --> 00:18:53,150 an arrangement that was handled in securities offerings 389 00:18:53,150 --> 00:18:56,400 and they created something, and they put out, in essence, 390 00:18:56,400 --> 00:18:58,600 a legal white paper, if you wish, 391 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:02,460 called a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens, SAFT, 392 00:19:02,460 --> 00:19:04,320 to try to address, they thought-- 393 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:07,098 they thought-- I think they were wrong, by the way. 394 00:19:07,098 --> 00:19:08,640 But they thought they were addressing 395 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:15,090 a bunch of regulatory issues that somehow this SAFT, this 396 00:19:15,090 --> 00:19:19,710 would be maybe have to register under the securities laws 397 00:19:19,710 --> 00:19:20,910 in the US. 398 00:19:20,910 --> 00:19:23,520 But when you finally got the token, 399 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:28,590 maybe later it would not have to be a registered security. 400 00:19:28,590 --> 00:19:32,760 And they were trying to do a two-tiered arrangement. 401 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:37,860 But even before you got to this Boston law firm that did this, 402 00:19:37,860 --> 00:19:39,810 you still had the economic reality 403 00:19:39,810 --> 00:19:42,780 that you were trying to raise money 404 00:19:42,780 --> 00:19:45,600 today to get a token later. 405 00:19:45,600 --> 00:19:50,842 And then the lawyers got involved to try to-- 406 00:19:50,842 --> 00:19:52,300 I would say they were trying to get 407 00:19:52,300 --> 00:19:55,750 between the wallpaper and the wall of regulation 408 00:19:55,750 --> 00:19:58,510 and say, we'll register the first thing, 409 00:19:58,510 --> 00:19:59,900 we'll give it a fancy name. 410 00:19:59,900 --> 00:20:00,950 We'll call it a SAFT. 411 00:20:00,950 --> 00:20:03,280 We won't register the second thing when you finally 412 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:05,390 get the token 12 months later. 413 00:20:05,390 --> 00:20:08,340 I think they'll probably end up mistaken on that. 414 00:20:08,340 --> 00:20:13,050 But I think that was the background. 415 00:20:13,050 --> 00:20:14,760 Let me hit a couple other points. 416 00:20:14,760 --> 00:20:17,760 Scarcity is usually, but not always, fostered 417 00:20:17,760 --> 00:20:20,030 through some monetary policy. 418 00:20:20,030 --> 00:20:26,370 If we go back to Nakamoto consensus and Bitcoin, 419 00:20:26,370 --> 00:20:28,400 what's the monetary policy there? 420 00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:30,360 Anybody remember that monetary? 421 00:20:30,360 --> 00:20:32,220 I call it monetary policy, but it's 422 00:20:32,220 --> 00:20:37,600 the control of the supply of the money supply. 423 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:40,750 So what's the money supply algorithm in Bitcoin? 424 00:20:40,750 --> 00:20:41,470 Eilon? 425 00:20:41,470 --> 00:20:43,333 AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] 426 00:20:43,333 --> 00:20:44,125 GARY GENSLER: Half? 427 00:20:44,125 --> 00:20:45,330 Half of what? 428 00:20:45,330 --> 00:20:50,010 AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] reward for the blocks. 429 00:20:50,010 --> 00:20:51,540 GARY GENSLER: So there's a reward. 430 00:20:51,540 --> 00:20:54,750 The Bitcoin monetary policy is a reward of-- 431 00:20:54,750 --> 00:20:57,345 anybody remember the reward today? 432 00:20:57,345 --> 00:20:58,220 AUDIENCE: 12.5 coins. 433 00:20:58,220 --> 00:20:59,940 GARY GENSLER: 12 and 1/2 coins today. 434 00:20:59,940 --> 00:21:04,550 It started at 50 coins every how many minutes? 435 00:21:04,550 --> 00:21:06,770 10 minutes on average. 436 00:21:06,770 --> 00:21:10,400 But every 200,000 blocks, it halves. 437 00:21:10,400 --> 00:21:12,740 So somewhere out in the 22nd century, 438 00:21:12,740 --> 00:21:15,740 it will cap at 21 million coins. 439 00:21:15,740 --> 00:21:19,210 But way before that, the monetary policy, 440 00:21:19,210 --> 00:21:23,330 it's slowing and slowing and slowing the growth rate. 441 00:21:23,330 --> 00:21:27,950 So embedded in the algorithm of Bitcoin is a monetary policy. 442 00:21:27,950 --> 00:21:30,420 Is it immutable? 443 00:21:30,420 --> 00:21:35,340 How many people would say that's hard coded and immutable? 444 00:21:35,340 --> 00:21:36,150 Not a hand. 445 00:21:36,150 --> 00:21:40,250 How many people would say it's actually not immutable? 446 00:21:40,250 --> 00:21:41,330 So what can change it? 447 00:21:41,330 --> 00:21:43,180 Alan, you didn't raise your hand either way. 448 00:21:43,180 --> 00:21:46,850 AUDIENCE: It depends how you define immutable. 449 00:21:46,850 --> 00:21:50,877 GARY GENSLER: Yes, I'm listening. 450 00:21:50,877 --> 00:21:52,710 AUDIENCE: If you change the monetary policy, 451 00:21:52,710 --> 00:21:53,878 you're going to have a fork. 452 00:21:53,878 --> 00:21:55,670 You're going to have the old folks sticking 453 00:21:55,670 --> 00:21:56,890 with the old policy and the new folks 454 00:21:56,890 --> 00:21:58,098 sticking with the new policy. 455 00:21:58,098 --> 00:21:59,855 And now, what has changed? 456 00:21:59,855 --> 00:22:01,980 Some people argue nothing has changed, while others 457 00:22:01,980 --> 00:22:03,022 argue something has seen. 458 00:22:03,022 --> 00:22:04,022 GARY GENSLER: All right. 459 00:22:04,022 --> 00:22:06,350 So Alin's pointing out not everybody will go along 460 00:22:06,350 --> 00:22:07,980 with the new monetary policy. 461 00:22:07,980 --> 00:22:10,130 But I would note on Ethereum, they've 462 00:22:10,130 --> 00:22:12,680 changed their monetary policy two or three times. 463 00:22:12,680 --> 00:22:15,530 And they haven't had to use a hard fork. 464 00:22:15,530 --> 00:22:19,130 So they've changed their block reward. 465 00:22:19,130 --> 00:22:23,870 And in changing a block reward, by lowering the block rewards, 466 00:22:23,870 --> 00:22:26,390 by consensus, they effectively are 467 00:22:26,390 --> 00:22:29,660 changing their monetary policy, because they're changing, 468 00:22:29,660 --> 00:22:33,520 in essence, their inflation rate. 469 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:38,230 But most initial coin offerings have some algorithm, 470 00:22:38,230 --> 00:22:42,550 some built in, what we'll call, money supply policy 471 00:22:42,550 --> 00:22:46,470 or monetary policy, but not all of them do. 472 00:22:46,470 --> 00:22:48,030 Some, if you read them closely, they 473 00:22:48,030 --> 00:22:51,480 can issue as much as they want whenever they want 474 00:22:51,480 --> 00:22:52,620 and so forth. 475 00:22:52,620 --> 00:22:56,550 But I would say the majority have a monetary policy. 476 00:22:56,550 --> 00:22:59,100 If this space, if this world really took off a, 477 00:22:59,100 --> 00:23:03,660 lot of monetary policy economists would study it. 478 00:23:03,660 --> 00:23:05,610 But there's not a lot of deep research 479 00:23:05,610 --> 00:23:08,070 yet on what works, what doesn't work. 480 00:23:08,070 --> 00:23:10,590 It's a playground or a sandbox if it 481 00:23:10,590 --> 00:23:14,700 were to ever take off as to exploring 482 00:23:14,700 --> 00:23:16,290 hard monetary policies. 483 00:23:16,290 --> 00:23:17,110 Sean? 484 00:23:17,110 --> 00:23:20,130 AUDIENCE: So just based on those six criteria, 485 00:23:20,130 --> 00:23:21,660 maybe apart from the last one. 486 00:23:21,660 --> 00:23:22,800 It looks to me like-- 487 00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:23,580 GARY GENSLER: You want to get rid of that one? 488 00:23:23,580 --> 00:23:23,940 AUDIENCE: Yeah. 489 00:23:23,940 --> 00:23:25,520 It looks to me like a Kickstarter. 490 00:23:25,520 --> 00:23:26,430 GARY GENSLER: Like a what? 491 00:23:26,430 --> 00:23:27,430 AUDIENCE: A Kickstarter. 492 00:23:27,430 --> 00:23:29,040 GARY GENSLER: A Kickstarter. 493 00:23:29,040 --> 00:23:31,110 So this looks like Kickstarter to you? 494 00:23:34,210 --> 00:23:40,590 But does Kickstarter give you something else? 495 00:23:40,590 --> 00:23:41,442 Anything? 496 00:23:41,442 --> 00:23:45,670 AUDIENCE: It depends on how you structure the terms. 497 00:23:45,670 --> 00:23:49,680 Basically, most of the items that are posted on Kickstarter, 498 00:23:49,680 --> 00:23:54,240 they use the funding to build their product. 499 00:23:54,240 --> 00:23:56,600 It's before it's actually functional. 500 00:23:56,600 --> 00:23:59,115 And it's also open source. 501 00:23:59,115 --> 00:24:02,160 It's pretty much the same. 502 00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:03,093 GARY GENSLER: Shimon? 503 00:24:03,093 --> 00:24:04,760 AUDIENCE: There's a very big difference, 504 00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:07,670 which is that Kickstarter, you fix the price 505 00:24:07,670 --> 00:24:11,240 and you let the market determine the quantity, right? 506 00:24:11,240 --> 00:24:13,670 And arguably, you fix the quantity 507 00:24:13,670 --> 00:24:16,730 and you let the market determine the price. 508 00:24:16,730 --> 00:24:18,860 That's a big difference between those two, 509 00:24:18,860 --> 00:24:23,460 and the fact that there's a secondary market, right? 510 00:24:23,460 --> 00:24:26,980 You can also sell your items, lieke the super early bird 511 00:24:26,980 --> 00:24:29,600 items in a secondary market. 512 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:30,550 Sure, you could. 513 00:24:30,550 --> 00:24:34,940 And again, this is nothing-- 514 00:24:34,940 --> 00:24:36,130 yes, you can. 515 00:24:36,130 --> 00:24:39,050 I mean, I would argue that it's a lot harder, right? 516 00:24:39,050 --> 00:24:43,390 But it also is the case that, if I'm selling a new widget, 517 00:24:43,390 --> 00:24:48,450 I'm not going to sell the early birds for $30, right? 518 00:24:48,450 --> 00:24:50,480 That's the price, right? 519 00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:53,490 And here, you're letting-- 520 00:24:53,490 --> 00:24:56,018 the auction is for the price not for the coin. 521 00:24:56,018 --> 00:24:58,310 GARY GENSLER: So there are similarities to Kickstarter. 522 00:24:58,310 --> 00:25:02,150 There's similarities to other crowd funding mechanisms, 523 00:25:02,150 --> 00:25:07,740 but there's also some real distinctions in terms of-- 524 00:25:07,740 --> 00:25:09,890 one, of course, this is all digital assets. 525 00:25:09,890 --> 00:25:12,610 And Kickstarter often there is a service or a good, 526 00:25:12,610 --> 00:25:16,070 a physical good, or a service you're getting. 527 00:25:16,070 --> 00:25:18,290 But also, what Shimon does? 528 00:25:18,290 --> 00:25:19,242 Hugo? 529 00:25:19,242 --> 00:25:21,200 AUDIENCE: Just to push back on that last point, 530 00:25:21,200 --> 00:25:23,510 often the ICOs are priced in theory. 531 00:25:23,510 --> 00:25:26,690 And then only on the secondary markets do the prices change. 532 00:25:26,690 --> 00:25:29,000 Isn't that the case? 533 00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:31,430 If you want to spit in an ICO, they'll 534 00:25:31,430 --> 00:25:38,240 be like, oh, here's 1,000 points for 0.1 F. And that, I guess, 535 00:25:38,240 --> 00:25:41,603 varies based on price fluctuations in US dollars, 536 00:25:41,603 --> 00:25:43,020 if you're still taking US dollars. 537 00:25:43,020 --> 00:25:46,500 But since you're using Ether to pay for the ICO-- 538 00:25:49,798 --> 00:25:51,590 GARY GENSLER: Hugo's saying it's not really 539 00:25:51,590 --> 00:25:58,080 that price is variable until it gets to the secondary market. 540 00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:02,030 But I would contend that one big difference between most 541 00:26:02,030 --> 00:26:04,310 of what's done on Kickstarter, not everything 542 00:26:04,310 --> 00:26:07,610 but most, and here is here the investors 543 00:26:07,610 --> 00:26:10,610 really are looking and anticipating 544 00:26:10,610 --> 00:26:12,960 profits and returns. 545 00:26:12,960 --> 00:26:14,480 And when I think of most people that 546 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:15,938 are going into Kickstarter, they're 547 00:26:15,938 --> 00:26:22,100 getting one product, one unit of something as a reward. 548 00:26:22,100 --> 00:26:25,360 And they're not looking for a significant profit 549 00:26:25,360 --> 00:26:27,740 or appreciation. 550 00:26:27,740 --> 00:26:29,887 They could-- maybe a modest, but not a-- 551 00:26:29,887 --> 00:26:31,220 AUDIENCE: The secondary market-- 552 00:26:31,220 --> 00:26:33,470 the super early birds in the secondary market-- 553 00:26:33,470 --> 00:26:36,470 GARY GENSLER: Super early birds, yeah. 554 00:26:36,470 --> 00:26:39,710 So there is monetary policy and this last point, 555 00:26:39,710 --> 00:26:42,050 that purchases really are anticipating profits 556 00:26:42,050 --> 00:26:44,810 through appreciation. 557 00:26:44,810 --> 00:26:46,280 So that's what I think of. 558 00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:48,150 Now, how to you evaluate ICOs? 559 00:26:48,150 --> 00:26:50,720 You're not going to be surprised by my first one. 560 00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:54,170 It's what we've talked a lot about in this class. 561 00:26:54,170 --> 00:26:57,090 Assess the viability of the token use case. 562 00:26:57,090 --> 00:27:00,440 Like, does it make any sense? 563 00:27:00,440 --> 00:27:03,710 Does it make any sense? 564 00:27:03,710 --> 00:27:06,590 Do you need to use an append only log 565 00:27:06,590 --> 00:27:08,810 with a consensus among a bunch of parties 566 00:27:08,810 --> 00:27:12,200 that can write to a ledger? 567 00:27:12,200 --> 00:27:14,520 So append only logs and consensus, 568 00:27:14,520 --> 00:27:17,860 throw a bunch of cryptography in there, too. 569 00:27:17,860 --> 00:27:20,800 And do you need a native token? 570 00:27:20,800 --> 00:27:23,020 Those basic fundamental economics 571 00:27:23,020 --> 00:27:25,600 that we've talked about a lot this semester, 572 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:27,820 hopefully, will save you off from investing 573 00:27:27,820 --> 00:27:31,480 in really bad ICOs. 574 00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:35,230 But beyond that, which I think is over 50% of what you should 575 00:27:35,230 --> 00:27:39,970 do, read the white paper. 576 00:27:39,970 --> 00:27:44,670 I tell you, if anybody could read the Telegraph white paper 577 00:27:44,670 --> 00:27:48,030 that they raised $1.7 billion and please tell me-- 578 00:27:48,030 --> 00:27:49,562 feel free to tell me what they are 579 00:27:49,562 --> 00:27:51,270 going to use that money for, because I've 580 00:27:51,270 --> 00:27:55,342 read it a number of times and I wouldn't invest in it, 581 00:27:55,342 --> 00:27:57,300 because it felt like they could raise the money 582 00:27:57,300 --> 00:27:59,040 and do almost anything they want with it. 583 00:28:01,860 --> 00:28:03,570 I mean, they're an incredible company. 584 00:28:03,570 --> 00:28:05,430 They've got hundreds of millions of users. 585 00:28:05,430 --> 00:28:09,758 And they have incredible resources to draw upon, 586 00:28:09,758 --> 00:28:11,550 but I'm still not sure what they're using-- 587 00:28:14,100 --> 00:28:16,880 what I will ultimately be able to use the coin for, 588 00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:19,420 what service I can get from that, 589 00:28:19,420 --> 00:28:21,290 and what they're using the money for. 590 00:28:21,290 --> 00:28:23,330 So I would say, read the white paper. 591 00:28:23,330 --> 00:28:24,950 And if there's source code, which 592 00:28:24,950 --> 00:28:28,335 is less than half the time there's source code, 593 00:28:28,335 --> 00:28:29,960 have somebody you trust read the source 594 00:28:29,960 --> 00:28:32,140 code if you can't read it. 595 00:28:32,140 --> 00:28:34,490 Who's the team? 596 00:28:34,490 --> 00:28:38,320 Just like any venture capital investor, 597 00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:39,760 you want to know who's the team. 598 00:28:39,760 --> 00:28:40,840 What's their history? 599 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:42,860 What's their experience and so forth? 600 00:28:42,860 --> 00:28:46,120 But I start with the economics and the white paper 601 00:28:46,120 --> 00:28:50,380 before I get to the team and the website. 602 00:28:50,380 --> 00:28:52,930 Is there venture capital involvement, 603 00:28:52,930 --> 00:28:56,290 and who and which ones? 604 00:28:56,290 --> 00:28:59,890 Now, VCs often will take part of the-- 605 00:28:59,890 --> 00:29:03,370 at this stage will take part of the equity and also 606 00:29:03,370 --> 00:29:05,170 part of the coin round. 607 00:29:05,170 --> 00:29:07,780 So they're doing hybrid investments. 608 00:29:07,780 --> 00:29:12,070 It's very rare, now in November of 2018, 609 00:29:12,070 --> 00:29:13,570 that a venture capitalist will only 610 00:29:13,570 --> 00:29:16,330 take a part of the token round. 611 00:29:16,330 --> 00:29:19,510 In late '17, there were still some they were just getting 612 00:29:19,510 --> 00:29:23,830 on this parade and taking parts of the pre-- 613 00:29:23,830 --> 00:29:26,890 basically, the pre-round of the tokens. 614 00:29:26,890 --> 00:29:31,990 But now, they want part of the actual equity and tokens. 615 00:29:31,990 --> 00:29:34,330 Erik, were you asking? 616 00:29:34,330 --> 00:29:37,240 AUDIENCE: No, it's just that's exactly what we 617 00:29:37,240 --> 00:29:43,780 got from a VC that mentioned that they go with a free ICO 618 00:29:43,780 --> 00:29:46,600 round of investment first as a means 619 00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:51,160 to assess the capability of the full body offering, 620 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:53,363 and then go through the ICO again. 621 00:29:53,363 --> 00:29:55,030 GARY GENSLER: But their first investment 622 00:29:55,030 --> 00:29:58,295 is either preferred or an equity-like instrument. 623 00:29:58,295 --> 00:29:59,170 AUDIENCE: Absolutely. 624 00:29:59,170 --> 00:30:01,750 And I feel like it changes completely the time 625 00:30:01,750 --> 00:30:04,080 from the investment for a venture capitalist, which 626 00:30:04,080 --> 00:30:07,840 normally would for five to 10 years. 627 00:30:07,840 --> 00:30:10,460 And here, it's like you're going to hide 628 00:30:10,460 --> 00:30:15,910 for the next few months, and then just resell the coins 629 00:30:15,910 --> 00:30:17,050 right after. 630 00:30:17,050 --> 00:30:18,190 What is the time frame? 631 00:30:18,190 --> 00:30:21,370 GARY GENSLER: So Alexis's observation 632 00:30:21,370 --> 00:30:25,330 is this might shorten the time frame for venture capitalists. 633 00:30:25,330 --> 00:30:29,530 I would say yes during this 2017-2018 period. 634 00:30:29,530 --> 00:30:32,510 I don't know if that will persist. 635 00:30:32,510 --> 00:30:36,770 But yes, I think that, for venture capitalists saying, 636 00:30:36,770 --> 00:30:39,680 well, I can be taken up by selling the company, 637 00:30:39,680 --> 00:30:43,580 I can be taken out of my investor term-- 638 00:30:43,580 --> 00:30:47,000 how am I going to sell my investment, my take out? 639 00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:51,650 I can take the company public, I can sell the company, or maybe 640 00:30:51,650 --> 00:30:57,960 I can ICO, and if you can do it sooner. 641 00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:02,060 And what happened a lot in the fall of '17 and into '18 642 00:31:02,060 --> 00:31:03,710 is many venture capitalists changed 643 00:31:03,710 --> 00:31:08,060 their standard contracts and their standard documentation 644 00:31:08,060 --> 00:31:11,390 when they were investing in start ups 645 00:31:11,390 --> 00:31:14,740 to say also that they could participate in the ICO round 646 00:31:14,740 --> 00:31:17,630 and that they could participate in the early rounds. 647 00:31:17,630 --> 00:31:19,442 But if you're assessing an ICO and you're 648 00:31:19,442 --> 00:31:20,900 thinking about investing in it, you 649 00:31:20,900 --> 00:31:23,530 want to know what venture capitalists are backing it. 650 00:31:26,390 --> 00:31:29,150 And then a big thing that folks look at-- 651 00:31:29,150 --> 00:31:31,970 I put it fifth on the list, as you can see-- 652 00:31:31,970 --> 00:31:33,770 is what's the community. 653 00:31:33,770 --> 00:31:35,480 How many Redis post, Medium posts? 654 00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:38,385 How many people are following Bitcoin talk, et cetera, 655 00:31:38,385 --> 00:31:39,260 et cetera, et cetera? 656 00:31:39,260 --> 00:31:42,370 There's eight or 10 of these talk channels. 657 00:31:42,370 --> 00:31:45,020 And I don't know the ratios anymore, 658 00:31:45,020 --> 00:31:47,750 but it used to be if you could get 659 00:31:47,750 --> 00:31:51,530 to like 7,000 to 10,000 folks following you on Reddit 660 00:31:51,530 --> 00:31:53,300 and Medium and everything, you knew 661 00:31:53,300 --> 00:31:55,910 you could raise a successful ICO. 662 00:31:55,910 --> 00:31:59,000 Like in the heyday, if you could get your numbers 663 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:02,820 to a certain following, then that 664 00:32:02,820 --> 00:32:07,920 was enough momentum to raise your $15 to $30 million. 665 00:32:07,920 --> 00:32:11,030 I think that's probably a little less so now. 666 00:32:11,030 --> 00:32:11,660 Tom? 667 00:32:11,660 --> 00:32:14,160 AUDIENCE: I mean, this is just the definition of the greater 668 00:32:14,160 --> 00:32:15,570 fool theory, right? 669 00:32:15,570 --> 00:32:18,980 If enough people believe that your token is valuable, 670 00:32:18,980 --> 00:32:20,610 then it's valuable. 671 00:32:20,610 --> 00:32:23,490 So I get that it's the fifth thing on the list for a reason. 672 00:32:23,490 --> 00:32:24,323 GARY GENSLER: Right. 673 00:32:24,323 --> 00:32:26,100 But if you're a momentum investor 674 00:32:26,100 --> 00:32:27,420 and you're just saying-- 675 00:32:27,420 --> 00:32:29,730 or if it's FOMO investing as Sabrina 676 00:32:29,730 --> 00:32:33,988 said, to see how big the community is. 677 00:32:33,988 --> 00:32:35,280 And is there an interest in it? 678 00:32:35,280 --> 00:32:36,860 Does this have a following? 679 00:32:39,480 --> 00:32:41,850 I said I'm neither a maximalist nor a minimalist. 680 00:32:41,850 --> 00:32:43,260 I'm just not-- 681 00:32:43,260 --> 00:32:45,150 I'm not trying to-- 682 00:32:45,150 --> 00:32:47,320 but this is real economics. 683 00:32:47,320 --> 00:32:51,630 If you had 100,000 people following in a community, 684 00:32:51,630 --> 00:32:53,760 probably more likely it's a successful ICO 685 00:32:53,760 --> 00:32:54,960 in terms of raising money. 686 00:32:54,960 --> 00:32:58,840 It doesn't mean it's going to be successful as a token later on. 687 00:32:58,840 --> 00:32:59,490 Here? 688 00:32:59,490 --> 00:33:05,960 AUDIENCE: You don't actually use it as a specific criterion, 689 00:33:05,960 --> 00:33:10,650 but you can use it maybe as a filter, the first filter. 690 00:33:10,650 --> 00:33:12,990 If you have that the person who's 691 00:33:12,990 --> 00:33:15,750 publishing the white paper has not been posted, 692 00:33:15,750 --> 00:33:18,540 he's never been there, then it raises 693 00:33:18,540 --> 00:33:19,840 a little bit of suspicion. 694 00:33:19,840 --> 00:33:23,760 And then you have to go on and do some more 695 00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:28,860 research on the paper, on the idea, on the guy, whatever. 696 00:33:28,860 --> 00:33:31,230 GARY GENSLER: It is a way to see whether there's 697 00:33:31,230 --> 00:33:34,485 other people even tuning in and showing interest. 698 00:33:37,045 --> 00:33:38,670 And it could be the greater fool theory 699 00:33:38,670 --> 00:33:41,940 just because if Tim Draper, Mike Novogratz 700 00:33:41,940 --> 00:33:45,960 is invested, who are both very savvy investors and very 701 00:33:45,960 --> 00:33:49,030 successful investors, you might say, do I want to be in? 702 00:33:49,030 --> 00:33:52,050 Or is that my time to say it's not to be in, 703 00:33:52,050 --> 00:33:54,750 because they've already gotten the best of it. 704 00:33:54,750 --> 00:33:59,090 Either way, I mean, they're still good investors. 705 00:33:59,090 --> 00:34:01,430 What's their monetary policy? 706 00:34:01,430 --> 00:34:03,830 Again, how's it going to affect-- 707 00:34:03,830 --> 00:34:07,760 can they-- is it one of the majority that 708 00:34:07,760 --> 00:34:09,324 has a fixed monetary policy? 709 00:34:09,324 --> 00:34:10,699 Or is it one of the minority that 710 00:34:10,699 --> 00:34:14,800 has no monetary policy at all? 711 00:34:14,800 --> 00:34:16,449 How did they distribute the tokens? 712 00:34:16,449 --> 00:34:17,545 And I mean in two ways. 713 00:34:20,500 --> 00:34:24,590 Basically, some will actually disclose a cap table, 714 00:34:24,590 --> 00:34:27,699 a capitalization table of the tokens, the same way 715 00:34:27,699 --> 00:34:31,159 you can think of a capitalization table of equity, 716 00:34:31,159 --> 00:34:35,320 but who owns the tokens pre-sale and post-sale. 717 00:34:35,320 --> 00:34:37,690 So that's what I mean by token distribution. 718 00:34:37,690 --> 00:34:42,752 Are they keeping 10% for the founder or 80% for the founder? 719 00:34:42,752 --> 00:34:45,880 It might change your view on all of it. 720 00:34:45,880 --> 00:34:48,850 But also token distribution is how are they selling it 721 00:34:48,850 --> 00:34:54,100 during what's usually a 30 to 60 day period or 15 to 60 day 722 00:34:54,100 --> 00:34:54,940 period. 723 00:34:54,940 --> 00:34:58,270 The longest that I am aware of is 350 days. 724 00:34:58,270 --> 00:35:00,940 EOS sold over 350 days. 725 00:35:00,940 --> 00:35:04,940 Every day was a form of a Dutch auction. 726 00:35:04,940 --> 00:35:09,610 It was a remarkable way that they sold 4.2 billion. 727 00:35:09,610 --> 00:35:12,220 I doubt that anybody who did EOS at the beginning 728 00:35:12,220 --> 00:35:14,262 thought they were going to raise over $1 billion. 729 00:35:14,262 --> 00:35:17,500 In fact, maybe nobody thought they'd raise over $100 million, 730 00:35:17,500 --> 00:35:21,270 because they started in the summer of '17. 731 00:35:21,270 --> 00:35:24,360 But they did a distribution over 350 days. 732 00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:28,270 Most, though, are done over 15 to 60 days or so. 733 00:35:28,270 --> 00:35:28,920 Please. 734 00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:32,670 AUDIENCE: So you mentioned [INAUDIBLE] 735 00:35:32,670 --> 00:35:34,470 how are ICOs accounted for? 736 00:35:34,470 --> 00:35:37,950 Do they go as equity on their revenue? 737 00:35:37,950 --> 00:35:39,192 Where do they fall? 738 00:35:39,192 --> 00:35:40,650 GARY GENSLER: So terrific question. 739 00:35:40,650 --> 00:35:46,640 How are ICO proceeds accounted for? 740 00:35:46,640 --> 00:35:47,550 Who's our accountant? 741 00:35:47,550 --> 00:35:49,590 Aviva? 742 00:35:49,590 --> 00:35:50,627 AUDIENCE: No idea. 743 00:35:50,627 --> 00:35:52,460 GARY GENSLER: All right, no idea from Aviva. 744 00:35:52,460 --> 00:35:54,930 I want to try to answer it, but anybody? 745 00:35:54,930 --> 00:35:57,560 AUDIENCE: I think that's another important feature. 746 00:35:57,560 --> 00:36:02,150 It's the token economics, how you use potential incentive, 747 00:36:02,150 --> 00:36:07,310 [INAUDIBLE] and for the profit of the project, 748 00:36:07,310 --> 00:36:11,540 the project would repurchase their tokens 749 00:36:11,540 --> 00:36:14,108 in a way similar to a dividend. 750 00:36:14,108 --> 00:36:15,650 GARY GENSLER: But how do you book it? 751 00:36:15,650 --> 00:36:17,390 What's the debit and what's the credit? 752 00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:22,700 AUDIENCE: Marketable securities and cash. 753 00:36:22,700 --> 00:36:23,950 GARY GENSLER: What's that? 754 00:36:23,950 --> 00:36:25,580 AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] 755 00:36:25,580 --> 00:36:28,545 GARY GENSLER: I hope this works. 756 00:36:28,545 --> 00:36:31,280 You know of the T account, right? 757 00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:32,280 We've got the T account. 758 00:36:32,280 --> 00:36:36,368 Over here's cash, right? 759 00:36:36,368 --> 00:36:38,410 Because you receive cash when you sell something. 760 00:36:38,410 --> 00:36:40,410 What's the credit item? 761 00:36:40,410 --> 00:36:41,410 AUDIENCE: Question mark. 762 00:36:41,410 --> 00:36:42,460 GARY GENSLER: What's that? 763 00:36:42,460 --> 00:36:43,410 AUDIENCE: Retained earnings. 764 00:36:43,410 --> 00:36:45,190 GARY GENSLER: You think it's retained earnings? 765 00:36:45,190 --> 00:36:45,773 AUDIENCE: Yes. 766 00:36:45,773 --> 00:36:48,450 GARY GENSLER: You think it's just retained earnings? 767 00:36:48,450 --> 00:36:50,480 AUDIENCE: They're selling nothing. 768 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:51,480 GARY GENSLER: All right. 769 00:36:51,480 --> 00:36:53,760 So the question is, is it earnings? 770 00:36:53,760 --> 00:36:56,520 Is it a revenue item when you sell it? 771 00:36:56,520 --> 00:37:00,400 Or some people book it as deferred revenue. 772 00:37:04,740 --> 00:37:06,660 So there's two ways you can book it. 773 00:37:06,660 --> 00:37:09,260 You could also book it as a liability, 774 00:37:09,260 --> 00:37:13,650 but it's either deferred revenue or current revenue. 775 00:37:13,650 --> 00:37:16,080 All right, what could motivate you to book 776 00:37:16,080 --> 00:37:19,710 it as a deferred revenue instead of current revenue? 777 00:37:19,710 --> 00:37:20,367 What's that? 778 00:37:20,367 --> 00:37:21,450 AUDIENCE: Taxes, probably. 779 00:37:21,450 --> 00:37:22,650 GARY GENSLER: Taxes. 780 00:37:22,650 --> 00:37:24,660 So some book it as deferred revenues, 781 00:37:24,660 --> 00:37:27,390 because they don't want to book taxes. 782 00:37:27,390 --> 00:37:31,320 And God knows whether that's really the right way 783 00:37:31,320 --> 00:37:32,340 to book it. 784 00:37:32,340 --> 00:37:39,380 And others book it right as a revenue item right now. 785 00:37:39,380 --> 00:37:41,800 But I don't know of anybody, whether they're booking it 786 00:37:41,800 --> 00:37:45,600 as deferred revenues or current revenues, that 787 00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:49,770 wants to book it to trigger that it's a security. 788 00:37:49,770 --> 00:37:53,640 So most law firms that I understand, they're not they're 789 00:37:53,640 --> 00:37:57,000 not accountants, but they don't want their clients 790 00:37:57,000 --> 00:38:02,630 to book it in a way that will make it look more like equity. 791 00:38:02,630 --> 00:38:05,630 So it's either deferred revenue or current revenue. 792 00:38:05,630 --> 00:38:07,760 Some, I've heard, have called it a liability, 793 00:38:07,760 --> 00:38:10,730 but I think that's the minority. 794 00:38:10,730 --> 00:38:12,730 AUDIENCE: I don't know if it takes too much time 795 00:38:12,730 --> 00:38:18,760 to go through a use case to make these examples tangible. 796 00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:21,070 If I'm promising to deliver a good, 797 00:38:21,070 --> 00:38:27,220 then the company is getting back the tokens, right? 798 00:38:27,220 --> 00:38:32,310 How do you put it back out again in the market? 799 00:38:32,310 --> 00:38:34,560 GARY GENSLER: So the question is what is the use case. 800 00:38:34,560 --> 00:38:37,750 So some use cases, the token is issued 801 00:38:37,750 --> 00:38:40,340 and it's really for the community. 802 00:38:40,340 --> 00:38:43,130 And some tokens come back to the company. 803 00:38:43,130 --> 00:38:46,970 So a file storage, Filecoin, for instance, 804 00:38:46,970 --> 00:38:52,490 they raised $250-some million, the equivalent of. 805 00:38:52,490 --> 00:38:54,230 And in that case, I think the token 806 00:38:54,230 --> 00:38:57,680 would be used within the community 807 00:38:57,680 --> 00:39:01,010 rather than back to the company. 808 00:39:01,010 --> 00:39:03,290 So even like Ethereum, when you use 809 00:39:03,290 --> 00:39:08,690 Ethereum as a form of buying computing power, 810 00:39:08,690 --> 00:39:11,800 it doesn't go back to the Ethereum Foundation. 811 00:39:11,800 --> 00:39:15,750 So the most dominant-- 812 00:39:15,750 --> 00:39:19,550 and that's why it really should be booked as current revenue, 813 00:39:19,550 --> 00:39:23,330 because it's not even that the software provider is providing 814 00:39:23,330 --> 00:39:26,240 a service later. 815 00:39:26,240 --> 00:39:30,850 The most dominant use case is, like in Ethereum, 816 00:39:30,850 --> 00:39:36,620 that you're using the Eth for other people in the network. 817 00:39:36,620 --> 00:39:39,890 It's a monetary unit that's not coming back. 818 00:39:39,890 --> 00:39:42,880 There are some where it comes back, 819 00:39:42,880 --> 00:39:48,910 and then it's basically returned to the corporate treasury. 820 00:39:48,910 --> 00:39:52,176 So it's two different models. 821 00:39:52,176 --> 00:39:53,807 Have I lost you or are you with me? 822 00:39:53,807 --> 00:39:54,682 AUDIENCE: [INAUDIBLE] 823 00:39:54,682 --> 00:39:56,470 GARY GENSLER: All right. 824 00:39:56,470 --> 00:40:01,020 One way is that it gets returned to the company. 825 00:40:01,020 --> 00:40:04,740 That's the more narrow case. 826 00:40:04,740 --> 00:40:07,390 Usually, it's you're selling a token that will be used. 827 00:40:07,390 --> 00:40:09,660 And I'll give it to Eilon, because Eilon 828 00:40:09,660 --> 00:40:11,510 gives me file storage. 829 00:40:11,510 --> 00:40:13,200 Eilon will give it to Tom, because Tom 830 00:40:13,200 --> 00:40:14,730 gives Eilon file storage. 831 00:40:14,730 --> 00:40:18,570 In Ethereum, it literally keeps going around 832 00:40:18,570 --> 00:40:21,540 and it doesn't get returned to-- 833 00:40:21,540 --> 00:40:26,680 it never gets burned and never gets extinguished 834 00:40:26,680 --> 00:40:28,300 and handed back to the company. 835 00:40:28,300 --> 00:40:34,900 AUDIENCE: And the pricing strategy on that first issuance 836 00:40:34,900 --> 00:40:37,510 depends then on the value of, if it's storage, 837 00:40:37,510 --> 00:40:40,330 on the value of storing-- 838 00:40:40,330 --> 00:40:42,050 GARY GENSLER: Well, in theory-- 839 00:40:42,050 --> 00:40:42,700 it's theory. 840 00:40:42,700 --> 00:40:46,210 I think that a lot of this has been on speculation and FOMO 841 00:40:46,210 --> 00:40:51,610 and things like that and a bubble, a 15 month or 18 month 842 00:40:51,610 --> 00:40:52,510 bubble. 843 00:40:52,510 --> 00:40:54,700 But on theory, yes, it should be-- 844 00:40:54,700 --> 00:40:56,740 to be in equilibrium, it should be 845 00:40:56,740 --> 00:41:01,480 a discount to the future value of storage, 846 00:41:01,480 --> 00:41:04,930 because today you're buying a token that you 847 00:41:04,930 --> 00:41:07,530 might be able to use tomorrow. 848 00:41:07,530 --> 00:41:09,580 But because there's a probability weighting 849 00:41:09,580 --> 00:41:13,610 that you won't be able to use it if they don't complete 850 00:41:13,610 --> 00:41:17,300 the software, if they don't complete the rollout, 851 00:41:17,300 --> 00:41:19,520 it should sell at a-- in equilibrium, 852 00:41:19,520 --> 00:41:26,730 it should sell at a discount to its eventual utility value. 853 00:41:26,730 --> 00:41:29,170 That would be where it would be in equilibrium. 854 00:41:29,170 --> 00:41:30,550 Shimon? 855 00:41:30,550 --> 00:41:31,900 AUDIENCE: So this is a question. 856 00:41:31,900 --> 00:41:37,840 Even in the bad use case, they're 857 00:41:37,840 --> 00:41:41,160 not pre-determining what one unit of coin 858 00:41:41,160 --> 00:41:43,017 is good for, right? 859 00:41:43,017 --> 00:41:44,100 GARY GENSLER: Usually not. 860 00:41:44,100 --> 00:41:47,040 Some white papers do, but usually not. 861 00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:49,140 AUDIENCE: Because it's not just-- 862 00:41:49,140 --> 00:41:51,480 if they told you, OK, one unit will 863 00:41:51,480 --> 00:41:53,933 buy you one terabyte of storage, now, of course, 864 00:41:53,933 --> 00:41:55,350 the value of a terabyte of storage 865 00:41:55,350 --> 00:41:57,558 would depend on the electricity, cost of electricity, 866 00:41:57,558 --> 00:41:59,623 and hardware, and all that stuff in the future-- 867 00:41:59,623 --> 00:42:01,790 I don't know-- and the supply, and blah, blah, blah. 868 00:42:01,790 --> 00:42:09,360 [INAUDIBLE] It's very hard to pin down the fundamental value 869 00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:15,080 of that coin outside of how it's going to scale 870 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:18,090 and how the community will be and all that stuff, 871 00:42:18,090 --> 00:42:22,980 because there's no clear allocation 872 00:42:22,980 --> 00:42:25,500 between the coin and the service that you would get. 873 00:42:28,375 --> 00:42:29,250 Does that make sense? 874 00:42:31,328 --> 00:42:32,370 GARY GENSLER: Let me see. 875 00:42:32,370 --> 00:42:36,095 You're asking absolutely the right question. 876 00:42:36,095 --> 00:42:38,220 It's one that I've been kicking around a little bit 877 00:42:38,220 --> 00:42:42,120 with a couple other faculty members in the finance group 878 00:42:42,120 --> 00:42:46,590 here, with Antoinette and Leonid who have done a lot of research 879 00:42:46,590 --> 00:42:47,770 in this area. 880 00:42:47,770 --> 00:42:50,100 And we're all like, we're not sure exactly. 881 00:42:50,100 --> 00:42:52,230 And these are some of the most world 882 00:42:52,230 --> 00:42:54,950 class talented finance faculty. 883 00:42:54,950 --> 00:43:00,990 Like, how do you really get to the value of a token, one, 884 00:43:00,990 --> 00:43:03,720 when there's so little written in these white papers 885 00:43:03,720 --> 00:43:06,590 about this specificity? 886 00:43:06,590 --> 00:43:09,540 And I gave one reading, which was Christian's reading, 887 00:43:09,540 --> 00:43:11,960 and I apologize, because it has a lot of formulas 888 00:43:11,960 --> 00:43:13,230 and everything. 889 00:43:13,230 --> 00:43:15,390 But he grapples with this. 890 00:43:15,390 --> 00:43:17,220 Where is it in equilibrium? 891 00:43:17,220 --> 00:43:18,942 What's the equilibrium price? 892 00:43:18,942 --> 00:43:20,400 And the equilibrium price should be 893 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:22,560 some discount to that future value 894 00:43:22,560 --> 00:43:24,920 of the service or the good. 895 00:43:24,920 --> 00:43:28,670 And if there is more uncertainty of what that service or good, 896 00:43:28,670 --> 00:43:31,880 it almost has to be a greater discount. 897 00:43:31,880 --> 00:43:34,780 And yet, it appears that the market has been pricing it 898 00:43:34,780 --> 00:43:35,600 at a way premium. 899 00:43:38,320 --> 00:43:40,920 So I think, if you didn't take anything 900 00:43:40,920 --> 00:43:42,920 from Christian's paper, that's what I was trying 901 00:43:42,920 --> 00:43:45,740 to-- that the market has been at a premium, 902 00:43:45,740 --> 00:43:48,710 even though it probably should be discounted. 903 00:43:48,710 --> 00:43:50,300 And that's why issuers-- 904 00:43:50,300 --> 00:43:53,720 that's why entrepreneurs have tapped into it, because it's 905 00:43:53,720 --> 00:43:56,910 a form of cheap financing. 906 00:43:56,910 --> 00:44:00,438 It's been a remarkable area of cheap financing. 907 00:44:00,438 --> 00:44:00,938 Please. 908 00:44:03,690 --> 00:44:07,997 AUDIENCE: So as we look forward to Filecoin [INAUDIBLE] 909 00:44:07,997 --> 00:44:10,080 so if we look at that and we flash forward to when 910 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:12,900 it's actually functional and whatever-- 911 00:44:12,900 --> 00:44:15,210 GARY GENSLER: And it's no longer SAFT. 912 00:44:15,210 --> 00:44:17,250 AUDIENCE: When it actually ever comes out, 913 00:44:17,250 --> 00:44:19,706 so is the idea that Filecoin at that point 914 00:44:19,706 --> 00:44:21,450 would transition to realized revenue? 915 00:44:21,450 --> 00:44:25,200 And then if I pay Don, three Filecoins 916 00:44:25,200 --> 00:44:28,470 or whatever the unit is for storage, that he books that 917 00:44:28,470 --> 00:44:31,380 as income and is taxed on that? 918 00:44:31,380 --> 00:44:35,580 Has there been any thought as to how-- 919 00:44:35,580 --> 00:44:37,230 GARY GENSLER: If Don is selling files, 920 00:44:37,230 --> 00:44:40,020 yes, he would have to book income, as I understand it. 921 00:44:40,020 --> 00:44:44,280 And you're transferring a coin, just like you're transferring 922 00:44:44,280 --> 00:44:47,940 a euro or a yen or a dollar. 923 00:44:47,940 --> 00:44:53,520 And at the time, the IRS has spoken to this five, 924 00:44:53,520 --> 00:44:55,020 six years ago. 925 00:44:55,020 --> 00:44:58,170 It's marked to market value the day 926 00:44:58,170 --> 00:45:02,700 that you, in essence, deliver the service 927 00:45:02,700 --> 00:45:03,960 and receive the coin. 928 00:45:03,960 --> 00:45:06,030 I mean, I'm not entirely sure what 929 00:45:06,030 --> 00:45:07,800 happens if you get the coin a day later, 930 00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:12,690 but it's basically the market value 931 00:45:12,690 --> 00:45:18,330 at an exchange rate that day back to Fiat, always translated 932 00:45:18,330 --> 00:45:22,380 back to the Fiat currency, in this case the US dollar. 933 00:45:26,233 --> 00:45:27,900 AUDIENCE: So if you extend that example, 934 00:45:27,900 --> 00:45:30,570 where does Filecoin gain revenue on the transaction 935 00:45:30,570 --> 00:45:31,580 between Andrew and Don? 936 00:45:31,580 --> 00:45:33,775 Are they charging a transaction fee? 937 00:45:33,775 --> 00:45:34,900 GARY GENSLER: I don't know. 938 00:45:34,900 --> 00:45:37,290 I'll try to figure that out by next Tuesday, 939 00:45:37,290 --> 00:45:40,590 because we get ICOs twice. 940 00:45:40,590 --> 00:45:44,290 I'll dig in and try to answer, and if anybody else knows. 941 00:45:44,290 --> 00:45:50,290 But the revenue models vary with thousands of these. 942 00:45:50,290 --> 00:45:53,970 Whether, in essence, Filecoin's entire revenue model 943 00:45:53,970 --> 00:45:54,835 was the ICO? 944 00:45:58,740 --> 00:46:00,620 No? 945 00:46:00,620 --> 00:46:03,050 The second big piece of the revenue model 946 00:46:03,050 --> 00:46:06,990 is retaining some ownership. 947 00:46:06,990 --> 00:46:09,330 So let's look at Ripple, the company. 948 00:46:09,330 --> 00:46:12,390 Ripple, the company, though they did their genesis block back 949 00:46:12,390 --> 00:46:18,270 in 2013, they basically distributed 20% of their tokens 950 00:46:18,270 --> 00:46:20,970 and kept 80%. 951 00:46:20,970 --> 00:46:24,000 And subsequently, they have been slowly selling 952 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:26,980 and they're now down to 61%. 953 00:46:26,980 --> 00:46:29,700 But their revenue model on XRP is, in essence, 954 00:46:29,700 --> 00:46:33,310 selling the XRP. 955 00:46:33,310 --> 00:46:36,400 They only came up with a real use case of XRP 956 00:46:36,400 --> 00:46:40,580 in 2018 in a prototype called XRapid. 957 00:46:40,580 --> 00:46:43,840 They had XCurrent, which was a messaging system prior that 958 00:46:43,840 --> 00:46:46,660 didn't need to use XRP at all. 959 00:46:46,660 --> 00:46:51,810 So for four years, you had no use of XRP, 960 00:46:51,810 --> 00:46:55,190 as I understand it zero use. 961 00:46:55,190 --> 00:46:59,320 Today, it's the second highest valued cryptocurrency. 962 00:46:59,320 --> 00:47:02,990 It's past Ethereum with the fall-off of the value 963 00:47:02,990 --> 00:47:04,936 of Ethereum and Bitcoin. 964 00:47:04,936 --> 00:47:09,110 And at $18 billion, I couldn't tell you what it's worth. 965 00:47:09,110 --> 00:47:13,660 I can tell you that's what coinmarket.com or .cap says 966 00:47:13,660 --> 00:47:15,900 they're worth. 967 00:47:15,900 --> 00:47:20,770 But their revenue model is selling XRP in that case. 968 00:47:20,770 --> 00:47:23,030 And so many of them, their revenue models 969 00:47:23,030 --> 00:47:29,330 are the initial ICO, keep a bucket, whether you keep 10%, 970 00:47:29,330 --> 00:47:33,140 or in that case it was 80%, and then try to monetize and sell 971 00:47:33,140 --> 00:47:35,880 it over time. 972 00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:40,110 And even in Ethereum, which was, in essence, an ICO, 973 00:47:40,110 --> 00:47:44,920 they kept about 9% in the Ethereum Foundation. 974 00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:48,570 They're down to 1% ownership in the Ethereum Foundation. 975 00:47:48,570 --> 00:47:50,370 So they don't receive-- and when Ethereum 976 00:47:50,370 --> 00:47:54,000 moves around the network, the Ethereum Foundation and Vitalik 977 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:55,740 Buterin don't receive any of that. 978 00:47:58,530 --> 00:48:01,600 But I'd have to look at Filecoin to see whether, in essence, 979 00:48:01,600 --> 00:48:03,120 they burn any. 980 00:48:03,120 --> 00:48:06,330 In essence, does any of it go back to the issuer? 981 00:48:06,330 --> 00:48:07,770 I don't think so, but I'll check. 982 00:48:10,720 --> 00:48:13,766 Take this, and then we'll move on to a couple statistics. 983 00:48:13,766 --> 00:48:17,100 AUDIENCE: I was wondering who is regulating the ICO. 984 00:48:17,100 --> 00:48:18,100 GARY GENSLER: All right. 985 00:48:18,100 --> 00:48:19,750 So who regulates the ICOs we're going 986 00:48:19,750 --> 00:48:22,750 to talk a lot about on Tuesday after Thanksgiving, when we 987 00:48:22,750 --> 00:48:27,520 can thank and eat some turkey. 988 00:48:27,520 --> 00:48:28,990 So can we hold that for Tuesday? 989 00:48:28,990 --> 00:48:32,848 But it really depends on the jurisdiction. 990 00:48:32,848 --> 00:48:35,140 Here in the US, it would be the Securities and Exchange 991 00:48:35,140 --> 00:48:37,760 Commission, because most of these 992 00:48:37,760 --> 00:48:41,560 are really non-compliant securities offerings. 993 00:48:41,560 --> 00:48:47,587 And last Friday, the SEC put out a release. 994 00:48:47,587 --> 00:48:49,420 I mean, they've put out many, many releases. 995 00:48:49,420 --> 00:48:52,060 But last Friday's, maybe we'll put that up. 996 00:48:52,060 --> 00:48:54,430 Sabrina and Thalita if you remind me, 997 00:48:54,430 --> 00:48:57,670 I'll shoot you a link and we'll put it into Canvas. 998 00:48:57,670 --> 00:48:59,230 But it's only two or three pages. 999 00:48:59,230 --> 00:49:00,688 But for the first time, they really 1000 00:49:00,688 --> 00:49:02,970 talked about illegal securities offerings. 1001 00:49:02,970 --> 00:49:05,860 So they used the word illegal. 1002 00:49:05,860 --> 00:49:07,810 And they're starting to get to the place 1003 00:49:07,810 --> 00:49:11,530 where they're shutting some of these down that were not 1004 00:49:11,530 --> 00:49:16,800 necessarily scammy or fraudy, but just 1005 00:49:16,800 --> 00:49:18,330 saying you didn't register. 1006 00:49:21,480 --> 00:49:25,050 But generally speaking, it would be securities regulators, 1007 00:49:25,050 --> 00:49:27,320 if it's regulated. 1008 00:49:27,320 --> 00:49:30,110 In some jurisdictions, it's not. 1009 00:49:30,110 --> 00:49:31,610 So this is the most important thing. 1010 00:49:31,610 --> 00:49:36,600 Can you assess the viability of token use case? 1011 00:49:36,600 --> 00:49:38,340 You remember my little slides. 1012 00:49:38,340 --> 00:49:41,410 But again, it's the strategic questions. 1013 00:49:41,410 --> 00:49:44,220 And these are the same questions I'm asking you to think about 1014 00:49:44,220 --> 00:49:46,050 in your final papers. 1015 00:49:46,050 --> 00:49:48,510 Basically, what's the value creation proposition 1016 00:49:48,510 --> 00:49:49,350 or pain points? 1017 00:49:49,350 --> 00:49:51,060 What are competitors doing? 1018 00:49:51,060 --> 00:49:54,060 How are competitors facing off in this? 1019 00:49:54,060 --> 00:49:55,620 And if you're looking at any ICO, 1020 00:49:55,620 --> 00:49:57,480 just think about the competitive landscape. 1021 00:49:57,480 --> 00:50:00,960 Some of them are quite populated with a lot of competition. 1022 00:50:00,960 --> 00:50:04,180 File storage, Filecoin is not the only one, 1023 00:50:04,180 --> 00:50:06,180 so you look at the others and see how they're 1024 00:50:06,180 --> 00:50:09,390 addressing the same issues. 1025 00:50:09,390 --> 00:50:12,090 And really, why is a blockchain technology or native 1026 00:50:12,090 --> 00:50:13,920 token even the solution? 1027 00:50:13,920 --> 00:50:15,900 And then you get digging into it. 1028 00:50:15,900 --> 00:50:19,200 Why do you need an append only log? 1029 00:50:19,200 --> 00:50:24,660 What verification and networking cost are actually addressed? 1030 00:50:24,660 --> 00:50:28,010 What transactions are actually recorded on a ledger? 1031 00:50:28,010 --> 00:50:32,060 I mean, these are the basic building blocks 1032 00:50:32,060 --> 00:50:35,210 that if you take anything away, hopefully it's 1033 00:50:35,210 --> 00:50:41,060 this one page of questions to have some critical skills 1034 00:50:41,060 --> 00:50:43,100 as you go off and somebody says, well, I've 1035 00:50:43,100 --> 00:50:48,980 got this great blockchain idea or great token. 1036 00:50:48,980 --> 00:50:53,120 And then not to forget all the darn challenges that we still 1037 00:50:53,120 --> 00:50:59,060 have-- scalability, performance, privacy, security, network 1038 00:50:59,060 --> 00:51:02,360 coordination, and interoperability. 1039 00:51:02,360 --> 00:51:06,750 I know only you say there's no challenges of interoperability. 1040 00:51:06,750 --> 00:51:09,757 AUDIENCE: No, no, no, don't put words in my mouth. 1041 00:51:09,757 --> 00:51:11,840 GARY GENSLER: So these, I'm not going to rereview, 1042 00:51:11,840 --> 00:51:13,978 but they're going to be in Canvas 1043 00:51:13,978 --> 00:51:15,020 if you want to grab them. 1044 00:51:15,020 --> 00:51:19,250 I mean, this is the same conceptual framework for an ICO 1045 00:51:19,250 --> 00:51:22,220 or even in a permissioned blockchain, 1046 00:51:22,220 --> 00:51:24,880 which I sense a lot of you are thinking about doing. 1047 00:51:24,880 --> 00:51:26,930 So some statistics, and then we'll close it out. 1048 00:51:26,930 --> 00:51:30,110 And these are just fun charts that will all be in Canvas. 1049 00:51:30,110 --> 00:51:33,620 And I just went around finding different websites. 1050 00:51:33,620 --> 00:51:37,970 I don't know that you can trust any of these numbers, 1051 00:51:37,970 --> 00:51:40,350 but they're the best numbers out there. 1052 00:51:40,350 --> 00:51:43,210 So here are some of the industries. 1053 00:51:43,210 --> 00:51:45,320 23% is infrastructure. 1054 00:51:45,320 --> 00:51:49,730 That's $5 billion of raised, but most of that, I think, 1055 00:51:49,730 --> 00:51:50,960 is the EOS. 1056 00:51:50,960 --> 00:51:54,290 I think that's called an infrastructure project, 1057 00:51:54,290 --> 00:51:56,120 infrastructure because EOS is trying 1058 00:51:56,120 --> 00:51:58,230 to compete with Ethereum. 1059 00:51:58,230 --> 00:52:01,710 Finance communication trading and investment payments, 1060 00:52:01,710 --> 00:52:07,140 you see some consistency, a lot of financial sector use cases. 1061 00:52:07,140 --> 00:52:12,080 Gaming, and then you're down to 2% and 3% slices. 1062 00:52:12,080 --> 00:52:14,640 So there's just a little sense of some of the industries. 1063 00:52:14,640 --> 00:52:16,420 And again, this will all be on Canvas. 1064 00:52:16,420 --> 00:52:18,980 Here's published ICOs. 1065 00:52:18,980 --> 00:52:22,520 We peaked at about 500 a month, 400 or 500 a month 1066 00:52:22,520 --> 00:52:25,010 in February through April. 1067 00:52:25,010 --> 00:52:28,290 We're down to about 200 a month now. 1068 00:52:28,290 --> 00:52:29,910 Now, this means published. 1069 00:52:29,910 --> 00:52:32,490 That doesn't mean they've necessarily raised. 1070 00:52:32,490 --> 00:52:35,910 We're just under about 5,000 that have been published. 1071 00:52:35,910 --> 00:52:39,360 Maybe 3,000 give or take have raised some money. 1072 00:52:39,360 --> 00:52:41,160 And only about half of those actually 1073 00:52:41,160 --> 00:52:45,360 exist today, or that you can find them somewhere and so 1074 00:52:45,360 --> 00:52:46,330 forth. 1075 00:52:46,330 --> 00:52:50,490 The market-- this is the third quarter based on a website 1076 00:52:50,490 --> 00:52:52,710 called ICO Rating. 1077 00:52:52,710 --> 00:52:55,320 They publish a quarterly report. 1078 00:52:55,320 --> 00:52:57,750 I'm not saying it's completely exhaustive. 1079 00:52:57,750 --> 00:53:03,040 1.8 billion ICOs raised down 78% from Q2, 1080 00:53:03,040 --> 00:53:05,560 just to give you a sense of the size. 1081 00:53:05,560 --> 00:53:09,400 But $1 billion of blockchain VC raised in the same quarter. 1082 00:53:12,180 --> 00:53:16,770 ICOs surpassed VC investment in blockchain 1083 00:53:16,770 --> 00:53:18,660 in the third quarter of '17. 1084 00:53:18,660 --> 00:53:22,340 Before that, VC raise was higher. 1085 00:53:22,340 --> 00:53:23,670 And I think it's coming back. 1086 00:53:23,670 --> 00:53:27,930 And it's a reasonable shot that in one or two more quarters, 1087 00:53:27,930 --> 00:53:30,660 the VC number will be higher than the ICO number. 1088 00:53:30,660 --> 00:53:34,830 But this is just a hunch as to where we're headed. 1089 00:53:34,830 --> 00:53:38,635 Some other statistics-- of the 600, 1090 00:53:38,635 --> 00:53:43,350 this is one quarter, about 200 a month or 600 for the quarter 1091 00:53:43,350 --> 00:53:47,820 that they tracked, 84% are on the Ethereum and platform. 1092 00:53:47,820 --> 00:53:52,620 Almost every data source I can find ranges from 80% to 85%. 1093 00:53:52,620 --> 00:53:56,450 So it's still highly focused on Ethereum platform. 1094 00:53:56,450 --> 00:54:00,600 And I would say as the ICO boom comes off, 1095 00:54:00,600 --> 00:54:02,670 it's probably also one of the reasons 1096 00:54:02,670 --> 00:54:06,120 that Ethereum, the price and valuation of Ethereum 1097 00:54:06,120 --> 00:54:12,520 has come off as well, just because of the relationships. 1098 00:54:12,520 --> 00:54:15,490 Only 4% of these 600, or 24 of them, 1099 00:54:15,490 --> 00:54:19,310 got listed on an exchange, that they raised enough money. 1100 00:54:19,310 --> 00:54:20,290 But look at that. 1101 00:54:20,290 --> 00:54:24,750 57% raised less than $100,000 a piece. 1102 00:54:24,750 --> 00:54:27,410 So it's highly concentrated in a small-- 1103 00:54:27,410 --> 00:54:33,430 67% percent of the DApp ICos were unsuccessful, 1104 00:54:33,430 --> 00:54:35,320 whatever their measurement of unsuccessful. 1105 00:54:35,320 --> 00:54:39,850 They didn't raise money or they raised a little bit of money, 1106 00:54:39,850 --> 00:54:41,260 but the website went dark. 1107 00:54:41,260 --> 00:54:44,520 That's all within three months. 1108 00:54:44,520 --> 00:54:47,970 And again, I can't speak to how they measure success. 1109 00:54:47,970 --> 00:54:53,470 But 76% were just an idea. 1110 00:54:53,470 --> 00:54:55,540 This is, again, based on ICO rating. 1111 00:54:55,540 --> 00:55:00,715 And 1.37%-- you were at 1%? 1112 00:55:00,715 --> 00:55:03,320 You were at 5%? 1113 00:55:03,320 --> 00:55:05,510 But 1.7% had their code. 1114 00:55:05,510 --> 00:55:09,850 So 3% were either fully ready or had their source code. 1115 00:55:12,470 --> 00:55:15,140 So you want to read the white paper if you're really curious. 1116 00:55:15,140 --> 00:55:18,830 But 76%, you might say how can you raise money on an idea? 1117 00:55:18,830 --> 00:55:20,710 This is really prefunding. 1118 00:55:20,710 --> 00:55:24,020 And this is even after the bloom is off the rose. 1119 00:55:24,020 --> 00:55:29,190 This is the third quarter 2018. 1120 00:55:29,190 --> 00:55:32,220 Here's the industries again for the third quarter-- 1121 00:55:32,220 --> 00:55:35,590 exchanges and wallets, financial services, trading. 1122 00:55:35,590 --> 00:55:43,550 So it's deeply finance, a little bit health care, and so forth. 1123 00:55:43,550 --> 00:55:44,213 And let's see. 1124 00:55:44,213 --> 00:55:45,880 I think I have one or two more of these. 1125 00:55:45,880 --> 00:55:47,500 Oh, this is how they've done. 1126 00:55:47,500 --> 00:55:48,800 This is interesting to me. 1127 00:55:48,800 --> 00:55:51,040 This is the returns in the third quarter. 1128 00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:53,340 Now, I know this is actually before the sell-off 1129 00:55:53,340 --> 00:55:56,400 for the last week and a half. 1130 00:55:56,400 --> 00:56:00,000 The only sector that went up is-- 1131 00:56:00,000 --> 00:56:02,540 I don't even know which ICOs these are-- 1132 00:56:02,540 --> 00:56:05,710 the marketing and advertising. 1133 00:56:05,710 --> 00:56:07,552 Everything else got clobbered. 1134 00:56:10,790 --> 00:56:13,310 I've been around markets for a long time, three or four 1135 00:56:13,310 --> 00:56:14,270 decades. 1136 00:56:14,270 --> 00:56:17,990 When you get this type of return picture, 1137 00:56:17,990 --> 00:56:22,650 there's going to be fewer ICOs rather than more ICOs, 1138 00:56:22,650 --> 00:56:26,940 because it just keeps cutting down the investor enthusiasm. 1139 00:56:26,940 --> 00:56:30,380 I don't think it's FOMO anymore. 1140 00:56:30,380 --> 00:56:32,000 What's the opposite of FOMO? 1141 00:56:32,000 --> 00:56:33,347 AUDIENCE: Here. 1142 00:56:33,347 --> 00:56:34,430 GARY GENSLER: What's that? 1143 00:56:38,900 --> 00:56:43,560 So all right, so study questions for next Tuesday 1144 00:56:43,560 --> 00:56:46,850 is just we're going to go back to ICOs, 1145 00:56:46,850 --> 00:56:48,740 talk a little bit about the scams and frauds. 1146 00:56:48,740 --> 00:56:50,948 We're going to talk about the Securities and Exchange 1147 00:56:50,948 --> 00:56:51,500 Commission. 1148 00:56:51,500 --> 00:56:54,070 We've already talked a lot about their design feature. 1149 00:56:54,070 --> 00:56:57,800 So it's going to be like going back to some 1150 00:56:57,800 --> 00:56:59,030 of the regulatory things. 1151 00:56:59,030 --> 00:57:04,080 I'll try to look up on the Filecoin questions as well. 1152 00:57:04,080 --> 00:57:05,840 We will drop one more reading in, 1153 00:57:05,840 --> 00:57:07,790 which is just this quick two-pager 1154 00:57:07,790 --> 00:57:10,030 from the SEC from last Friday that 1155 00:57:10,030 --> 00:57:12,080 may be worthwhile looking at. 1156 00:57:12,080 --> 00:57:14,300 And this is the best thing I could 1157 00:57:14,300 --> 00:57:17,570 do to say Happy Thanksgiving. 1158 00:57:17,570 --> 00:57:22,010 I know it's a Bitcoin turkey, blockchain turkey, 1159 00:57:22,010 --> 00:57:23,120 and the like. 1160 00:57:23,120 --> 00:57:27,350 But I do think it's an interesting thing. 1161 00:57:27,350 --> 00:57:30,020 ICOs are a new means of crowdfunding. 1162 00:57:30,020 --> 00:57:32,270 And there's been so many different ways to raise money 1163 00:57:32,270 --> 00:57:34,340 over centuries. 1164 00:57:34,340 --> 00:57:38,630 This is not equity, it's not debt, it's something else. 1165 00:57:38,630 --> 00:57:41,300 I don't know how much of it will last three and five 1166 00:57:41,300 --> 00:57:46,010 years from now, but the idea that you could pre-fund 1167 00:57:46,010 --> 00:57:49,770 an idea, a deferred revenue or some sort, 1168 00:57:49,770 --> 00:57:55,040 but it's not your revenue, is an interesting evolution 1169 00:57:55,040 --> 00:57:57,560 in the markets of finance. 1170 00:57:57,560 --> 00:58:00,350 But I think if you can't assess the viability of the use case 1171 00:58:00,350 --> 00:58:03,440 and figure out what really is the benefit 1172 00:58:03,440 --> 00:58:05,170 of the token economics-- 1173 00:58:05,170 --> 00:58:08,840 that comes back to, is there really a benefit 1174 00:58:08,840 --> 00:58:11,390 to having a native token on a network 1175 00:58:11,390 --> 00:58:16,400 for a good or a service, for file storage, for ride sharing, 1176 00:58:16,400 --> 00:58:18,460 and so forth? 1177 00:58:18,460 --> 00:58:20,903 And then I think this will just be looked back-- decades 1178 00:58:20,903 --> 00:58:22,820 from now, people look back and say, well, that 1179 00:58:22,820 --> 00:58:26,630 was a small, little, odd thing that happened 1180 00:58:26,630 --> 00:58:29,340 back there in the 2010s. 1181 00:58:29,340 --> 00:58:31,800 But it might be. 1182 00:58:31,800 --> 00:58:34,230 I'm not all the way to zero. 1183 00:58:34,230 --> 00:58:36,150 I think there might be a reason why 1184 00:58:36,150 --> 00:58:38,850 folks want to have a native currency, 1185 00:58:38,850 --> 00:58:43,260 a native token to jumpstart a network 1186 00:58:43,260 --> 00:58:46,800 and to motivate a network over time, whether it's 1187 00:58:46,800 --> 00:58:52,410 like swords and skins and shields in a gaming site. 1188 00:58:52,410 --> 00:58:55,410 The majority of ICOs have failed already. 1189 00:58:55,410 --> 00:58:58,607 And because they keep failing so fast-- 1190 00:58:58,607 --> 00:59:00,190 I don't know-- by the end of this year 1191 00:59:00,190 --> 00:59:03,150 or certainly by the middle of next year, over 90% or 95% 1192 00:59:03,150 --> 00:59:08,430 of them will have failed, like if you take the whole total. 1193 00:59:08,430 --> 00:59:10,490 So it's pretty clear it's going to come down. 1194 00:59:10,490 --> 00:59:12,240 There's going to be less and less probably 1195 00:59:12,240 --> 00:59:13,820 in this ICO thing. 1196 00:59:13,820 --> 00:59:16,630 It doesn't mean that blockchain technology is over. 1197 00:59:16,630 --> 00:59:20,070 It just means that this wave, I think, will diminish. 1198 00:59:23,020 --> 00:59:25,325 So Happy Thanksgiving. 1199 00:59:25,325 --> 00:59:26,700 Is there a question before we all 1200 00:59:26,700 --> 00:59:28,997 go to Thanksgiving and airports and trains? 1201 00:59:28,997 --> 00:59:30,330 AUDIENCE: Just a quick question. 1202 00:59:30,330 --> 00:59:39,382 Does any ICO take ownership of the company besides [INAUDIBLE] 1203 00:59:39,382 --> 00:59:41,340 GARY GENSLER: So we'll talk about this Tuesday. 1204 00:59:41,340 --> 00:59:43,710 The question is, can you ever have 1205 00:59:43,710 --> 00:59:48,190 an ownership right in a token? 1206 00:59:48,190 --> 00:59:50,280 The answer is yes, you could structure 1207 00:59:50,280 --> 00:59:55,130 it to have voting rights, governance rights, dividend 1208 00:59:55,130 --> 00:59:55,630 rights. 1209 00:59:55,630 --> 00:59:58,780 There are a handful that have done that. 1210 00:59:58,780 --> 01:00:02,860 But after the DAO or DAO issuance, 1211 01:00:02,860 --> 01:00:07,110 which did give some governance rights and cash flow rights, 1212 01:00:07,110 --> 01:00:11,760 the SEC spoke to that in a paper one year ago or 15 months ago. 1213 01:00:11,760 --> 01:00:13,110 There's very few of them. 1214 01:00:13,110 --> 01:00:16,350 Most of them are what you would call either utility tokens 1215 01:00:16,350 --> 01:00:19,080 or service tokens, where you have a right 1216 01:00:19,080 --> 01:00:21,780 to get a service or a good usually 1217 01:00:21,780 --> 01:00:24,840 from the rest of that network, rather than back. 1218 01:00:24,840 --> 01:00:28,720 I'll check on Filecoin, but the answer is yes you can do it, 1219 01:00:28,720 --> 01:00:30,780 but it's a rare case that does it. 1220 01:00:30,780 --> 01:00:31,380 So thank you. 1221 01:00:31,380 --> 01:00:32,730 Happy Thanksgiving. 1222 01:00:32,730 --> 01:00:34,590 Thank you for all being in this class. 1223 01:00:34,590 --> 01:00:36,440 [APPLAUSE]